A straight line through the BSA standards, exactly as LINEST fits it
on the Std curve sheet. Everything below is worked out from the series
you pick here.
LINEST reads
column B only, and the sheet hedges next to the intercept with the comment
fit uses col B (A562). But column B is not a replicate of the other
two, it is an older, lower series: at 0 µg it reads 0.0795 where
Curva 1 reads 0.1341 and Curva 2 reads 0.1359. Which one belongs to your plate is
yours to say, so pick it. The default reproduces the spreadsheet.
| BSA µg/well | Column B A562 | Curva 1 | Curva 2 | Predicted A562 |
|---|
| Series | Slope | Intercept | R² | A562 range |
|---|
These are the spreadsheet’s yellow parameter cells. They apply to every sample below.
One to three A562 readings per sample; the mean is taken automatically and one reading is fine. Dilution is the factor you diluted the lysate by before the BCA well. The green columns are the volumes you pipette.
The curve. slope and intercept are a least-squares straight
line of A562 on BSA µg/well, which is what
INDEX(LINEST(...),1) and INDEX(LINEST(...),2) return.
R² is the third statistic of the same fit.
Each sample.
mean A562 →
µg in well = (mean − intercept) ÷ slope →
conc = µg in well × dilution ÷ well volume →
total protein = conc × lysate volume.
Then the recipe:
lysate per aliquot = target ÷ conc,
RIPA per aliquot = aliquot volume − that,
aliquots = total protein ÷ target,
RIPA total = RIPA per aliquot × aliquots,
final sample volume = lysate volume + RIPA total,
buffer = final volume ÷ (nX − 1),
β-mercap = (final volume + buffer) × %,
total = final volume + buffer + β-mercap.
The last column is the honest one, and it is the same for every sample.
µg actually loaded = total protein ÷ total volume × aliquot volume.
It comes out below the target because the buffer and the β-mercaptoethanol dilute the
sample after it was brought to the target concentration. Work the algebra through and it
cancels to target × (nX − 1) ÷ nX ÷ (1 + %), which has
no sample in it at all: with 100 µg per 20 µL,
4X buffer and 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol it is 73.17 µg for
every lane, whatever the reading was. That is the point of normalising each sample to the
same concentration first, and it is a useful check: if two samples show different numbers
here, one of them is flagged. It is the spreadsheet’s own behaviour, reproduced and
not corrected.
The worked example carried over from the spreadsheet. Its saved sample 1 is A562 0.300 in a 3 µL well, dilution 1, 41 µL of lysate, fitted on column B. That gives 15.872 µg in the well, 5.291 µg/µL, 216.92 µg total, 2.17 aliquots, 2.38 µL RIPA, 43.38 µL sample, 14.46 µL of 4X buffer, 1.45 µL β-mercap, 59.29 µL total and 73.17 µg per 20 µL loaded. Type it in and you should get those numbers back.
Three things this does that the spreadsheet does not.
A flagged sample is left off the printed sheet and out of the copied text unless you tick the box to include it, and either way the warnings travel with it.
Nothing you type leaves your computer. The sheet is stored in this browser only, and a different browser, or the same tool opened from a different address, keeps a different sheet.